If you've ever eaten at a Burger King in Ohio, it may well be one that is owned and operated by Carrols LLC, the largest franchisee of Burger King restaurants in the United States. Carrols and its related entities own over 560 Burger King franchises in 13 different states and employ over 17,000 employees. Carrols…
Read More
In the past year, and most recently on March 27, 2019, several lawsuits have been filed against IKEA in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging discrimination based on age (and one also on gender); these complaints (four of which are brought by the same plaintiff's counsel) are trying to…
Read More
The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided a murky issue regarding the Ohio saving statute, R.C. 2305.19 in Portee v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 155 Ohio St.3d 1, 2018-Ohio-3263. Click for full case. R.C. 2305.19(A) states: "In any action that is commenced or attempted to be commenced, if in due time a judgment for the plaintiff is…
Read More
In my previous blog "Does a Herbicide Make Rachael Ray's Nutrish Dog Food Not 'Nutrish'? One Pet Owner Thinks So," I noted that the court in Parks v. Ainsworth Pet Nutrition LLC, S.D.N.Y. No. 1:18-cv-06936, had set dates for briefing on the Defendant's (Rachel Ray Nutrish via Ainsworth Pet Nutrition LLC) motion to dismiss the…
Read More
For those of us practicing antitrust law in the Sixth Circuit, we are familiar with the case In re: Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation, 739 F.3d 262 (6th Cir. 2014). But there was also a northeastern component to the claimed antitrust violations asserted against Dairy Farmers of America ("DFA"). In that antitrust action, Allen v. Dairy…
Read More
The Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("OCSPA" or the "Act") (Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.01 et seq.) is a set of laws that aim to protect consumers from sales practices that are deceptive, unfair, or unconscionable. While the OCSPA serves a legitimate need of protecting consumers, its impact on businesses can be profound. Many Ohio…
Read More
A little more than two years after the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a class-wide settlement because the class plaintiffs were "inadequately represented" in violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the constitutional Due Process Clause and because the settlement was unreasonable and inadequate the parties are trying again to settle part of…
Read More