Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act in 2025: Modern Requirements for Protecting Servicemember Employment Rights

userra_bwrightThe Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) of 1994 codifies the belief that military service should not cost an individual a civilian career.  Although the statute is over three decades old, lawmakers and courts continue to refine and expand its reach.  Two critical legislative changes in the last three years (the Civilian Reservist Emergency Workforce Act of 2022 and Senator Elizabeth Dole Twenty‑First Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act of 2025) represent the most consequential updates since USERRA's original passage.  Employers that have not revisited their military leave policies recently should review the new provisions, which expand coverage, increase financial exposure, and tighten the standard for retaliation claims.

USERRA Protections

USERRA applies to all public and private employers, regardless of headcount, revenue, or geographic footprint.  The statute establishes three primary protections:

  1. Reemployment rights.  A servicemember who leaves civilian employment for qualified military service is entitled to return to the same or a comparable position with full seniority, status, and pay, provided the cumulative absence does not exceed five years and the employee satisfies notice and application deadlines.

  2. Employers may not deny initial employment, retention in employment, promotion, or any employment benefit based on past, present, or prospective uniformed service.

  3. Anti‑retaliation.  Employers may not retaliate against individuals who exercise USERRA rights or assist others in doing so.

Claims can be filed with the Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) at the United States Department of Labor.  Claimants may bypass the administrative process and file litigation in Federal Court.  Prevailing plaintiffs may recover back pay, benefits, attorneys' fees and, for willful violations, liquidated damages equal to lost compensation.

Recent Amendments

Congress has amended USERRA several times, often in response to judicial interpretations that narrowed coverage or to policy concerns raised by servicemember advocacy groups. Recent amendments focus on two perceived gaps:

  • Ambiguity regarding full‑time career military members.  Some employers argued that USERRA's purpose clause, which referred to "non‑career service," limited protection to reservists and national guard members.

  • Limited deterrence for retaliation.  Courts required a showing of "materially adverse action," a standard that arguably left subtle forms of reprisal unremedied.

The 2022 and 2025 amendments address both issues, while also strengthening remedies and clarifying procedural rights.

  1. Removal of the "non‑career" qualifier:  The Dole Act deletes the word "non‑career" from USERRA's statement of purpose, eliminating an argument that the law excludes full‑time active-duty members.  All uniformed servicemembers (reserve, guard, or regular) now fall squarely within the statute.

  2. Expanded retaliation standard:  The 2025 amendments reject the "materially adverse action" test.  Any act that would dissuade a reasonable person from asserting USERRA rights can support a retaliation claim, even if the act does not alter pay or title.

  3. Mandatory attorney fees and minimum liquidated damages:  Attorney fees are no longer discretionary; courts must award reasonable fees and costs to prevailing plaintiffs.  For willful violations, the Dole Act introduces a minimum liquidated damages award of fifty thousand dollars or, if greater, the total of lost wages and interest.

  4. Easier access to injunctive relief:  Servicemembers may seek preliminary injunctive relief, and courts may not deny relief solely because monetary damages could be awarded later. Immediate reinstatement, preservation of promotion opportunities, and maintenance of health benefits are common requests.

  5. Parity for paid short‑term military leave:  Separate from the federal amendments, actions have been filed challenging unpaid military leave policies by comparing them to paid leave granted for jury duty or sick time.  Employers must provide equivalent paid leave when absences are of comparable length and purpose.

  6. CREW Act coverage for FEMA reservists:  The Civilian Reservist Emergency Workforce Act clarifies that Federal Emergency Management Agency reservists who deploy under Stafford Act authorities receive USERRA protection.  Private and public employers must now treat FEMA duty the same as any other uniformed service.

Practical Compliance Steps

  • Update policy documents.  Employee handbooks and standalone military leave policies should reference the expanded retaliation standard.

  • Train front‑line supervisors.  Supervisors should understand that negative comments, unwarranted scrutiny, or schedule manipulation linked to military duties carry legal risk.

  • Review pay practices.  Evaluate whether the company provides paid leave for jury duty, bereavement, or other short absences.  If so, determine whether similar paid leave should apply to brief military obligations to mitigate parity claims.

  • Establish a reinstatement protocol.  Develop a checklist for restoring returning servicemembers to their role on the day they report, including seniority adjustments, benefit accruals, and retroactive pay adjustments for promotions that would have occurred absent service.

  • Document employment decisions.  Maintain clear records that show legitimate, non‑military reasons for adverse actions.  Documentation can be critical when the burden shifts to the employer during litigation.

Intersection with State Law

Many states supplement USERRA with broader protections.  Employers operating in multiple jurisdictions must harmonize federal and state obligations, applying the provision most favorable to the employee when conflicts arise.

Anticipated Enforcement Trends

  • Increase in litigation.  Paid leave parity claims are likely to accelerate.

  • Focus on retaliation.  The lower threshold for actionable retaliation, combined with mandatory attorney fees, will encourage servicemembers to test the boundaries of subtle discriminatory conduct.

  • Greater scrutiny in audits.  The Department of Labor may update its audit protocols to reflect the amended statute, placing new emphasis on policy language and supervisor training records.

USERRA, as strengthened in 2022 and 2025, seeks to ensure that those who serve do not forfeit civilian career progress.  The amendments translate into heightened legal exposure and stricter procedural standards for employers.  Updating policies, educating supervisors, and monitoring evolving caselaw provide the best defense.

About The Author

Brian Wright | Faruki Co-Managing Partner