• Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
    • Class Actions
    • Media/Communications
    • Data Security/Privacy
    • Intellectual Property
    • White Collar Crime
    • Corporate Counseling
    • Employment Law
  • People
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
    • Intellectual Property
    • Data Security/Privacy
    • Media/Communications
    • Class Actions
    • Corporate Counseling
    • Employment Law
    • White Collar Crime
      • Corporate Compliance
      • Corporate Victim Representation
      • Corporate Witness Representation
      • Individual & Corporate Criminal Defense
      • Internal Investigation
  • Industries
  • People
    • Partners
    • Attorneys
  • About the Firm
    • History
    • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact

Call Our Offices:

  • Cincinnati
  • Dayton
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
    • Class Actions
    • Media/Communications
    • Data Security/Privacy
    • Intellectual Property
    • White Collar Crime
    • Corporate Counseling
    • Employment Law
  • Industries
  • People
    • Partners
    • Attorneys
  • Faruki PLL
  • About the Firm
    • History
    • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact
Aug 04

When is Speaking to the Media About a Pending Lawsuit ‘Frivolous Conduct’ Under Ohio Law?

  • August 4, 2017
  • Erin Rhinehart
  • Media/Communications/Advertising Law

In an emotionally charged case involving child sexual abuse allegations and claims of wrongful termination, emerged an unlikely decision with the potential to curtail lawyers’ First Amendment rights in Ohio. The Cleveland-based trial court found that the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Peter Pattakos, violated Ohio’s frivolous conduct statute – R.C. §2323.51 – by communicating publically available information about the case to the media prior to trial.  Recognizing the likely implications of the trial court’s decision on free speech rights, and lack of supporting law, the appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision and confirmed that an award of sanctions is not appropriate where a lawyer communicates with the media about a pending case. Cruz, et al. v. English Nanny & Governess Sch., Inc., et al., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 103714, 2017-Ohio-4176 (June 8, 2017).

For more on this case, see my article in the July 2017 edition of the MLRC MediaLaw Letter.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail

About The Author

Erin E. Rhinehart | Faruki Partner

Comments are closed.

Blog

  • Business Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Data Security/Privacy
  • Communications/Media
  • Class Actions
  • Faruki Updates
  • Employment
  • Miscellaneous
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter – Media Law
  • Twitter – Privacy
  • YouTube

©2019 Faruki PLL

CINCINNATI

(513) 632-0300

201 E. Fifth Street
Suite 1420
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Directions

DAYTON

(937) 227-3700

110 N. Main St.
Suite 1600
Dayton, OH 45402
Directions